๐ฆ ๐ เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดตเดฏെ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เด F3B-NSPM Method เตปเดฑ്เดฑെ Scientific Logic ❗
๐ฆ ๐ เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดตเดฏെ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เด F3B-NSPM Method เตปเดฑ്เดฑെ Scientific Logic ❗
เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดตเดฏെ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดเดค് เดเด്เดเดจെ เดเดจ്เดจും, เด Method เดจേ เดชเดฑ്เดฑിเดฏും, เดാเตป เดเดตിเดെ เดชോเดธ്เดฑ്เดฑ് เดെเดฏ്เดฏാം เดเดจ്เดจ്, เดจേเดฐเดค്เดคെ เดชเดฑเด്เดിเดฐുเดจ്เดจു.
๐ 1. 2014 เดเดฃ്เดെเดค്เดคുเดฎ്เดชോเตพ, เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดต เดฏുเดെ เดുเด്เดിเดฏെ เดിเด്เดിเดฏെเด്เดിเดฒും, เดชൂเตผเดฃ്เดฃเดตเดณเตผเด്เดเดฏെเดค്เดคിเดฏ เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดตเดฏുเดെ เดซോเด്เดോ เดจเดฎുเด്เด് เดฒเดญിเด്เดിเดฐുเดจ്เดจിเดฒ്เดฒ .
2. เดുเด്เดിเดฏുเดെ เดชเดം เดตെเด്เด്, เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดตเดฏെ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดാเตป เดธാเดงിเด്เดുเดจ്เดจเดคเดฒ്เดฒ.
3. เดกിเดเตปเด เดชเดฐിเดถോเดงเดจാ เดซเดฒം เดชുเดฑเดค്เดคുเดตിเดാเดคെ เดซോเดฑเดธ്เดฑ്เดฑ് เดกിเดช്เดชാเตผเด്เด്เดฎെเตปเดฑ് เดฎเดจเดช്เดชൂเตผเดต്เดตം เดชൂเดด്เดค്เดคി เดตെเด്เดുเดเดฏും เดെเดฏ്เดคു.
❌ เดเดจ്เดจเดค്เดคെ เดจിเดฒเดฏിเตฝ เดฒോเดเดค്เดค് DNA เดെเดธ്เดฑ്เดฑ് เตฝ เดൂเดിเดฏเดฒ്เดฒാเดคെ, เดเดฐു เดชുเดคിเดฏ เดเดจ്เดคു เดตเตผเด്เดเดค്เดคെ เดฏാเดคൊเดฐു เดാเดฐเดฃเดตเดถാเดฒും เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดുเดตാเตป เดธാเดงിเด്เดിเดฒ്เดฒ .
๐ เด เด്เดเดจെ เดจോเด്เดുเดฎ്เดชോเตพ เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดต, ➖ เดเดฐിเด്เดเดฒും เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดเดช്เดชെเดാเดคെ , เดชോเดുเดฎാเดฏിเดฐുเดจ്เดจു.
เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดാเดคെ เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดต เดเดฃ്เด് เดเดจ്เดจ് เดฒോเดം เด ംเดീเดเดฐിเด്เดുเดตാเตป, เดช്เดฐเดฏാเดธം เดเดฏിเดฐുเดจ്เดจേเดจെ.
เด เดช്เดชോเตพ เด เดคിเดจെ เดธംเดฐเด്เดทിเด്เดുเดตാเตป เดตเดณเดฐെ เดฌുเดฆ്เดงിเดฎുเด്เด് เดจേเดฐിเดും .
⛔ 1. เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดตเดฏുเดെ เดธംเดฐเด്เดทเดฃเดค്เดคിเดจ് เดตเดจ്เดจേเด്เดാเดตുเดจ്เดจ เดฌുเดฆ്เดงിเดฎുเด്เดുเดเตพ เดเดดിเดตാเด്เดുเดตാเดจും ;
⛔ 2. เดเดคുเดชോเดฒുเดณ്เดณ, เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐം เด ംเดീเดเดฐിเด്เดാเดคിเดฐുเดจ്เดจ, ๐ เดเดจ്เดจാเตฝ เดฏเดฅാเตผเดค്เดฅเดค്เดคിเตฝ เดเดณ്เดณ , เดเดจ്เดคുเดตเตผเดเด്เด เดณെ เดൂเดി, เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดുเดตാเตป , เดตേเดฃ്เดി เดเดฃ് ; DNA TESTS เดൂเดാเดคെ, เดชുเดคിเดฏ เดเดจ്เดคുเดตเตผเดเด്เดเตพ เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดുเดจ്เดจ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฐീเดคി เดฐൂเดชเดช്เดชെเดുเดค്เดคിเดฏെเดുเดค്เดคเดค്.
..........................................................................................
๐ฆ เดเดฐു เดชുเดคിเดฏ เดเดจ്เดคു เดตเตผเด്เดเดค്เดคെ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดാเตป เดกിเดോ เดคോเดฎเดธ് เดเดฃ്เดുเดชിเดിเด്เด F3B-NSPM Method เดขിเตปเดฑെ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏ เดฏുเด്เดคിเดฏെเด്เดുเดฑിเด്เดുเดณ്เดณ เดธംเด്เดฐเดนം !
เดกിเดോ เดคോเดฎเดธ് เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดตเดฏെ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏเดฎാเดฏി เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เด เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏ เดฐീเดคി เดเดจ്เดคാเดฃ്? เดเดจ്เดคാเดฃ് เดเดคിเดจ്เดฑെ เดฒോเดിเด്?
๐ F3B-NSPM Method
● 1. เดീเดตเดจോเดെเดฏോ เดเดค്เดคോ เดเดฏിเด്เดുเดณ്เดณ เดเดฐെเดฃ്เดฃเดค്เดคിเตปเดฑെ เดธാเดฎ്เดชിเตพ 2. เดจേเดฐിเด്เดുเดณ്เดณ เดാเดด്เด 3. เดซോเด്เดോเดเตพ 4. เดാเด്เดธോเดฃเดฎി 5. เดกി.เดเตป.เด เดെเดธ്เดฑ്เดฑുเดเตพ ➖ เดเดจ്เดจിเดต เดเดจ്เดจും เดเดฒ്เดฒാเดคെ , เดเดฐു เดชുเดคിเดฏ เดเดจ്เดคു เดตเตผเด്เดเดค്เดคെ เดคെเดณിเดฏിเด്เดാเตป , เดกിเดോ เดคോเดฎเดธ് เดเดฃ്เดുเดชിเดിเด്เด เดเดฐു เดชുเดคിเดฏ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏ เดฐീเดคി.
FB Translate เด Translation App เด เดตെเด്เด് เดฎเดฒเดฏാเดณเดค്เดคിเดฒേเด്เด് เด เดคเตผเด്เดเดฎ เดชെเดുเดค്เดคി เดตാเดฏിเด്เดാเดตുเดจ്เดจเดคാเดฃ്.
๐. เดช്เดฐเดค്เดฏേเดം เดถ്เดฐเดฆ്เดงിเด്เดേเดฃ്เดเดค് , เดเดตിเดെ เดเดตിเดെ เดൊเดുเดค്เดคിเดฐിเด്เดുเดจ്เดจเดค് F3B-NSPM Method เด เดฒ്เดฒ , เด เดคിเตปเดฑെ เดถാเดธ്เดค്เดฐീเดฏ เดฒോเดിเด്เดിเตปเดฑെ, เดตിเดถเดเดฒเดจം เดฎാเดค്เดฐเดฎാเดฃ് , เดเดจ്เดจുเดณ്เดณเดคാเดฃ്.
เดจീเดฒเดിเดฐി เดเดുเดตเดฏെ เดชเดฑ്เดฑിเดฏുเดณ്เดณ F3B-NSPM Method เดกിเตปเดฑെ เดธംเดทിเดช്เดค เดฐൂเดชം, เดจിเด്เดเตพเด്เด് เดตെเดฌ്เดธൈเดฑ്เดฑിเตฝ เดตാเดฏിเด്เดാเดตുเดจ്เดจเดคാเดฃ് :
http://wildlifescientist.com/NeelagiriKaduva-DijoThomas-proves.htm
..........................................................................................
■ Synopsis on the Scientific Logic of the F3B-NSPM Method Invented by Dijo Thomas to Scientifically Prove a New Species .
❓ ๐ณ What is the Scientific Method with which Dijo Thomas Scientifically Proved Neelagiri Tiger ? What is it's Logic ?
๐ F3B-NSPM Method
⚙๐ A NEW Scientific Method Invented by Dijo Thomas to Prove a New Species without
● 1. Specimen 2. Direct Sighting 3. Photos 4. Taxonomy or 5. DNA Tests❗❗
This Paper Explains How F3B-NSPM Method Actually Proves a New Species.
..........................................................................................
________________________________________________________
๐ณ It is TOTALLY IMPOSSIBLE to Prove a New Species without DNA Tests or Taxonomy. But not any more. ⚠
.
๐ด Dijo Thomas Invented a ๐ก New Method ๐ฐ
⭕ for the FIRST Time in the World ;
๐ to Prove a New Species without :
1. Specimen 2. Direct Sighting 3. Photos 4. DNA Tests or 5. Taxonomy.
.
๐ก The New Method has been named F3B-NSPM {Facts, Features, Factors etc. Based - New Species Scientifically Proving Method}.
...........................................................................................
▪️ The F3B-NSPM method can be used to Scientifically Prove highly Rare Species, for whom DNA Tests or other conditions cannot be done, due to lack of samples or Specimen.
▪️This method will become a Great Tool in CONSERVING Rare Wildlife all over the World, for whom DNA Test Cannot be done.
▪️ Dijo Thomas have Already Scientifically Proved Neelagiri Kaduva in early 2015 and Presented 6 Scientific Papers in 2 Indian Science Congress.
✅ I am ready to Prove this method before International Panel of Scientific Experts : Dijo Thomas ▪️
............................................................................................
๐พ 1. Neelagiri Tiger {Neelagiri Kaduva} ๐ , which is as Big as Tiger, is the First Species to be proved by this method !
๐ก 1. Neelagiri Kaduva was proved by 60 + Factors /Variables & More than 80 + Points.
▪️{If it is Proved by only 1 or 3 factors, there is a chance of it could be wrong. But with 40 + Factors /Variables (Total 60 + including minor) & More than 80 + points; there is absolutely NO CHANCE of the Scientific Proving of Neelagiri Tiger being Wrong ! : Dijo Thomas }
2. Raktha Athika - the 2nd Species to be proved by this method !
3. Neelagiri Cheruvan - the 3rd Species to be proved by this method !
4. Chupacabra [ Latin America ] - the 4th Species to be proved by this method !
⭕ Not only that Chupacabra had been Proved ASTONISHINGLY with out Photos or DNA Tests; but to add additional ASTONISHMENT -
it has been Proved from 15,000 Kms AWAY, in India❗
............................................................................................
๐ข F3B-NSPM has been now accepted by the Scientific Community. !! ✅
............................................................................................
๐ณ 4 Key Components of F3B-NSPM Method
● 1. Main Factors / Variables [ 40 + ]
▪️Eg.: Behavior Pattern, Attacking Pattern, Hunting Pattern, Eating Habit, Color, Pattern on body, Pug Marks etc.
{of the Mysterious Unknown Attacking Animal (UAA)[which is Neelagiri Kaduva]},
● 2. Points of Infrences and Conclusions
▪️Points are Infrences and Conclusions with Proof; drawn from the various Main Factors / Variables.
● 3. Eyewitnesses Accounts
There were about 25 + in First Discovery in Trivandrum and 30 + in Second Discovery in Thrissur.
Dijo Thomas has Interviewed more than 400 + Eyewitnesses from Kerala, Tamil Nadu and Karnataka, all through the Years and still Meeting New Eyewitnesses !
● 4. Historic Events and Historical Eyewitnesses details collected Before 1st Discovery of Neelagiri Tiger!
Historic and Eyewitnesses details collected by Dijo Thomas for 12 Years Even BEFORE the First Discovery of Neelagiri Tiger in Neyyar Dam in 2014 !
............................................................................................
๐ฅ Main Factors / Variables used for proving Neelagiri Kaduva [Neelagiri Tiger] through F3B-NSPM are given below:
..........................................................................................................
๐ณ 1. Behavior Pattern 2. Attacking Pattern 3. Hunting Pattern 4. Eating Habit {etc. of the Mysterious Unknown Attacking Animal (UAA)[which is Neelagiri Kaduva]},
5. Eye Witness accounts [25 + in my first Discovery alone]
6. Color of the Animal 7. Pattern on body
8. Pug Marks 9. Pug Marks Size (9 cm in Thiruvananthapuram & 12 cm in Thrissur)
10. Size of the animal 11. Shape
12.My Expertise with Wild Animals for the Past 15+ years
13.Historic Details I collected about Patti Kadva [Colloquial Name of Neelagiri Kaduva] from Manglore to Thiruvananthapuram [India]
14. My Observations in the Fields in Neyyar Dam
15. Tracking it for many days
16. Near miss [by me & group] in the Field 3 times on 29 Sep 2014 etc.
17. Ability of Unusual Stealth displayed by the UAA
18-19 Behavior Pattern, Hunting Pattern of the NK Cub
20. Local Adivasi [Tribal] Watchers confirming to me that their Elders have Seen / Known Neelagiri Tiger for centuries as Naai Puli[Dog Tiger]
21. Geographic Features & Location
22-60 : {Comparing Behavior/Attacking Pattern [1-4] with that of Leopard/Tiger/Dogs/Wild Dogs/Hyena/Wild Cats & other already known wild animals.
& about 10+ others ......
๐ This is DONE to Double Check Whether the Unknown Attacking Animal (UAA) is any of the Already Identified Species in the World.
..........................................................................................................
๐ฉ F3B-NSPM was Formulated using more than 80+ Points:
..........................................................................................................
Eg: 7. A dog will never catch & eat another dog. In Neyyar Dam area, many attacks, Killings on dogs and Disappearance of domestic dogs had taken place. I personally confirmed three of them.
13. 100% Pug Marks have Claws [Personally verified by me in more than 4 places in first two days alone - consisting of more than 50 impressions. + Forest Personnel had also verified it independently]. Therefore it is clearly not a Leopard (As all Eyewitnesses Claimed in Trivandrum) or Cat family.
14. The size of pug marks is Bigger than that of a Leopard {9 cm in Trivandrum – Only largest of leopeard will have 9 cm pug mark} and equal to a Tiger in Thrissur {12 cm}
..........................................................................................................
๐ช Eyewitnesses
..........................................................................................................
■ I have Interviewed over 350 + Eyewitnesses in 3 South Indian States, including 12 Years BEFORE My First Discovery of Neelagiri Kaduva in 2014, and 8 Years after My Discovery. Vast Majority of the Eyewitnesses I Interviewed were During a Discovery - Where an Attack was taking place LIVE { as in the Case of First Discovery in Neyyar Dam in 2014 and the Second Discovery in Thrissur in 2016 }
First of All, one should Understand that there are TWO Different TYPES of Eyewitnesses:
A. Historical Eyewitnesses ๐ฒ
B. Incident Eyewitnesses ๐ณ
..........................................................................................................
● How Trustworthy are the Eyewitness and how Accurate would be their Narration ?
The Initial Eyewitnesses would Not have Any Motive to Give False Information nor Narration. They also Don't stand to Gain Anything from Describing an Animal which Doesn't Exist ! Nor in Falsely Describing the Animal that they Saw !
[ ● You have to also Remember that there were many other Physical Evidences of Domestic Animals Killed, Eaten or Carried Away during the Neelagiri Kaduva Attacks in Villages, that led to Discovery of Neelagiri Tiger by Dijo Thomas ❗
● You have also to Remember that there were Multiple Eyewitnesses, who were not Related, in as much Days, during an Attack by Neelagiri Tiger, where Dijo Thomas went an Studied it. There is no Valid Reason for all these people to Gang Up and Lie !
● Below Average Intelligence is Only Needed for a Person to Remember and Repeat Correctly, the details of the Strange Wild Animal that he saw.
X But of late, There have been some Purposeful Attempts by Roman Catholics and some other Groups , by Setting Up False Eyewitness, as a TRAP to Discredit my Findings. I have come Across a few occasions like that ( mostly recently), and have Discarded them. You can see one of such Attempts here :
https://m.facebook.com/story.php?story_fbid=256100475926977&id=101503874719972
..........................................................................................................
Different Types of Eyewitnesses
๐ณ A. Historical Eyewitnesses ๐ฒ
Those who Already Know Patti Kaduva (Colloquial name of Neelagiri Tiger) by Information Handed down from Generation to Generation. This Type of Eyewitnesses Mostly occurs in the Periphery of Forests. They Themselves or their Close Friends or Relatives have Directly Seen Neelagiri Tiger, mostly when it was Catching a Dog.
The Historical Eyewitnesses Knew all the main Features of Neelagiri Kaduva, including Size, Shape, Color, Pattern on body, Food Habits etc.
As they Knew Neelagiri Kaduva very well and CO-EXISTED with it for Centuries, they had Given names for it, which Varied from place to place. Colloquial Names of Neelagiri Kaduva includes :
▪️Kerala: 1. Patti Kaduva (Dog Tiger) / 2. Naai Puli (Dog Tiger) / 3. Patti Puli (Dog Leopard) 4. Kattan Puli etc.
▪️Karnataka: Naai Huli (Dog Tiger)
▪️Tamil Nadu: 1. Naai Puli (Dog Tiger) 2. Kaduva Puli 3. Periya Nari 4. Naai Siruthai (Dog Leopard)
Historical Eyewitnesses are Eyewitnesses of many Centuries lineage, who had Known / Seen Neelagiri Kaduva even before Dijo Thomas first Discovered Neelagiri Tiger in 2014.
I had Interviewed numerous Historical Eyewitnesses in many { 6 + } Places, from Mangalore to Trivandrum ๐ 12 Years Even BEFORE MY FIRST DISCOVERY ❗
They told me :
1. A Wild Animal with Colloquial Names -
Patti Kaduva (Dog Tiger) / Naai Puli (Dog Tiger) / Patti Puli (Dog Leopard) Exists
2. Patti Kaduva [Colloquial Name of Neelagiri Kaduva] mainly Catches and Eats Dogs.
3. Patti Kaduva looks like a Dog, but much bigger.
4. Patti Kaduva had the Size of a Tiger.
๐พ There are 4 Types of Historical Eyewitnesses :
A. Primary Eyewitness
1. Regular Villagers living Near Forests who have seen Neelagiri Kaduva Directly.
2. Tribals who live Inside Forests and who knew Forests very well.
3. Those who have seen Neelagiri Kaduva Directly.
B. Secondary Eyewitness
4. Those who have NOT Seen Neelagiri Tiger Directly, but very close Relatives or Friends - Whom they Absolutely TRUST - like their own Grandparents, Father, Mother or Children have seen it, and then told them !
Type 1, 2, and 3 are the Best Eyewitnesses, but Even 4 is Relatively Good Eyewitness, as
as they Don't have any Motive for Lying !
๐ณ B. Incident Eyewitnesses ๐ณ ๐
▪️Incident Eyewitnesses are Mainly Eyewitnesses who Have SEEN Neelagiri Kaduva Directly (and many Clearly), during the Recent Attacks in Neyyar Dam, Trivandrum (2014), Kanjani (2016), Varkala, Trivandrum (2018) and many more.
๐พ 》》Though the Incident Eyewitnesses have Directly Seen Neelagiri Tiger, most of them Didn't know what Animal it is, as they have Not Seen it or Heard about it Before, but were able to Clearly see Neelagiri Tiger and later Describe it Clearly !
☑ But they have SEEN the Neelagiri Tiger Very Clearly, during the Attacks on Animals in Villages, including it's Features.
..........................................................................................................
๐ก 》》 Dijo Thomas First Came to Know [ ■ with 100% Certainty], about 12 Years Before his First Discovery in 2014, that Neelagiri Kaduva Existed, from Historical Eyewitnesses.
๐ข 》》 Dijo Thomas Confirmed the Contemporary Existence of Neelagiri Kaduva, [First in 25 Sep 2014, Nedumangad in 2015 ( both in Trivandrum district), Second Major Discovery in Thrissur 2016 and Many Others Later on] from Incident Eyewitnesses.
■ The point to Note is that all Historical Eyewitnesses would know the Details about Neelagiri Kaduva,
but Incident Eyewitnesses Mostly DIDN'T know about what Animal THEY SAW, (which was Neelagiri Kaduva - As they have Not Heard or seen this Animal before). The Incident Eyewitnesses will know about, What the Animal they saw Was; Only when Dijo Thomas would tell them what Animal it was ❗
..........................................................................................................
________________________________________________________
๐ฅ ๐ Final Inferences obtained by analyzing 60 + Factors /Variables & More than 80 + Points:
✅ 1. There are only 5 possible wild animals (even if the remotest possibility is considered), for the attacks in Neyyar Dam, if you discount Neelagiri Kaduva. They are 1. Doles [Wild dogs], 2. Hyenas, 3. Wild cats, 4. Feral Dogs & 5. Leopard.
Mr. Dijo Thomas proved beyond doubt that it is NOT caused by any of them.
✅ 2. There is NO identified animal, Anywhere in the World, with the Features, Size, Color of the Animal, Pugmarks, Behavior Pattern, Attacking Pattern, Hunting Pattern etc. – Found in a Single Animal – like the wild animal attacking in Neyyar Dam. [When we Combine all these Features of the Unknown Attacking Animal, Obtained and Observed in Neyyar Dam, to Form the Outline of a Single Animal]
✅ Therefore Unknown Attacking Animal is nothing known till now, and is a New Species.
........................................................................................
๐ฉ How Dijo Thomas Proved Scientifically that the Wild Animal Attacking in Neyyar Dam is a New Species can be Surmised as given below :
๐ด 3. ■ If you COMBINE all the 60 + Factors / Variables & More than 80 + Points ๐ ✅ You Will get the PICTURE of an Wild Animal ๐ ✅Which does NOT CORRESPOND to any KNOWN Wild Animal in the World ๐ ✅ and THEREFORE the Wild Animal Attacking in Neyyar Dam is CLEARLY a New Species
๐ฉ ๐ ■ Therefore Unknown Attacking Animal is nothing known till now; ✅ with the Size of a Tiger ✅ with the Shape of a Leopard /Tiger ✅ But with Features Very Different from a Tiger or Any Known Animal till now ✅ is Therefore a New Species which was named Neelagiri Kaduva by DijoThomas.
________________________________________________________
............................................................................................
๐ TOOLS USED :
▪️Possibility/Probability Factor, Proving beyond the scope of Probability Factor, Eliminating the Error Factor by Multiple Filtering, Truthful Assessment of Various Factors, Neutral Assessment, Comparison with other similar/dissimilar attacks, Historic Data Analysis, Accurate Analysis of Factors which didn’t Fit to ๐ KNOWN wild animal Attacks; Filtering Out Non-Related Eyewitnesses, Psychology ETC.
☑ Psychology plays a very important role while interviewing eye witness to check whether they are lying.
............................................................................................
๐ Scientific Paper Presentation
Dijo Thomas presented 6 Scientific Papers in 2 Indian Science Congress on
๐ Neelagiri Kaduva
๐ Raktha Athika
๐ F3B-NSPM method
-- the 2 NEW Species Discovered by him and the Method with which he Proved it ; in :
๐ณ 103rd Indian Science Congress; held at University of Mysore on 07 Jan 2016
2 Scientific Papers on
1. ๐ Neelagiri Kaduva
2. ๐ F3B-NSPM method on Neelagiri Kaduva
๐ณ 104th Indian Science Congress; held at SV University, Tirupathi in Jan 2017 -
2 Scientific Papers on
1. ๐ Raktha Athika
2. ๐ F3B-NSPM method on Raktha Athika
2 Scientific Papers on
3. ๐ Neelagiri Kaduva (an updated paper)
4. ๐ F3B-NSPM method on Neelagiri Kaduva
............................................................................................
❓Why I invented the F3B-NSPM Method ⁉️
The mother & the cub {of Neelagiri Kaduva}, were attacked by locals, & the cub was killed in Neyyar dam on 2 Oct 2014. >>>[You have to note that it is 7 days after my first discovery of Neelagiri Kaduva].
Dr. Jacob Alexander of Thiruvananthapuram Zoo, who had done the Postmortem, took 4 samples for DNA tests, due to request from Dijo Thomas. After 4 months, when I put Pressure, it was said that, a chemical added to the samples for sending for DNA tests was ‘CONVENIENTLY‘ a wrong one & therefore DNA test was not possible. It is a typical attempt at cover-up.
๐ If it were any known Species, they need to just have said: “Look, DNA test says this is so and so known Species”. But as it is a New Species, they could not say that, & Therefore the cover-Up. [You can see Media Reports during my 1st Discovery in my Website].
Therefore I was forced to prove Neelagiri Tiger by Inventing this New Method.
............................................................................................
๐ด You Can Read about the Actual Method F3B-NSPM on Neelagiri Kaduva here:
▪️http://WildlifeScientist.com/NeelagiriKaduva-DijoThomas-proves.htm
▪️http://WildlifeScientist.com [Visit > Neelagiri Kaduva> F3B-NSPM].
□ I have Published the F3B-NSPM Method for Neelagiri Kaduva in My Website since 2015, Giving a Chance for Anyone to Study my Findings, Challenge it Or Refute My Findings.
■ But till Date, No One, Not Even a Single Person had been able to Refute or Even At Least Challenge My Findings.
Dijo Thomas
▪️ Scientist
▪️ Wildlife Conservationist
▪️ Strategic Analyst
๐จ DijoThomas.com
๐ฉ WildlifeScientist.com
............................................................................................
All Rights Reserved.
▪️F3B-NSPM Method and all the Details, Findings, Infrences, Methodology etc. , are all the Intellectual Property Rights of Dijo Thomas.
▪️As I have Observed Recent Attempts by THOSE who were OPPOSING Neelagiri Kaduva Conservation all 7 Years till now, to
Hijack Dijo Thomas's Hardwork in Research, Discoveries etc. as their work, with the help of Politicians of Various Parties; any Publishing of Findings, Discovery, F3B-NSPM Method should be Published by Only giving due Credit to Dijo Thomas's Work.
▪️Researchers are NOT allowed to Re-Publish any of the above Research material without prior written permission from Dijo Thomas.
[● Till now (2020), I had NOT Placed Any Restrictions on Anyone Publishing My Findings, as My Hardwork are Only for Conservation and Not for Any Personal Credit;
BUT the Very Same People Opposing Neelagiri Kaduva Conservation all these 7 Years, are now Trying to STEAL My Findings as Their Own is TOTALLY UNACCEPTABLE.]
๐ Hence the New Conditions.
▪️ Wildlife Conservationists are Welcome to use Details about Neelagiri Kaduva for Conservation Purposes.
Dijo Thomas]
............................................................................................
Comments
Post a Comment